Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to validate instruments designed to measure the five components of adaptive intelligence, wisdom, creativity, problem-solving, analytical skills, and practical ability, and to identify the underlying factors of each construct. Adaptive intelligence is increasingly recognized as an essential competence for individuals to navigate rapidly changing environments, yet empirical studies that systematically validate its measurement tools remain limited. The study employed a quantitative validation design using exploratory factor analysis. Data were collected from 144 university students in Malang, Indonesia, selected through cluster sampling from a larger population. Five questionnaires, each consisting of 20 items, were developed in collaboration with expert lecturers to ensure content validity. Following a pilot test and revisions, the instruments were administered, and the data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 with Promax rotation and a loading threshold of 0.40. The results confirmed the multidimensional nature of adaptive intelligence. Wisdom was represented by three factors, creativity by two, problem-solving by three, analytical skills by three, and practical ability by four. These factor structures provide empirical evidence of adaptive intelligence's latent dimensions, highlighting its complexity as an integrated but multifaceted construct. The contribution of this study lies in both theoretical and practical domains. Theoretically, it advances the conceptual clarity of adaptive intelligence by specifying its latent dimensions. Practically, it provides validated instruments that educators and psychologists can employ to assess and foster adaptive capacities in students and professionals, supporting resilience and adaptability in diverse contexts.

Keywords

adaptive intelligence, wisdom, creativity, problem-solving, analytical skills, practical skills.

Article Details

How to Cite
Djiwandono, P. I. (2025). Validating Instruments for Measuring Adaptive Intelligence: A Construct Validation Study of Five Components. International Journal of Asian Education, 6(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v6i3.490

References

  1. Ad’hiya, E., & Laksono, E. W. (2018). Development and validation of an integrated assessment instrument to assess students’ analytical thinking skills in chemical literacy. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11416a
  2. AlAli, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Low PISA Performance Students: Factors, Perceptions, and Improvement Strategies. International Journal of Religion, 5(9), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.61707/nve8gj33
  3. Barbu, A., & Zhu, S.-C. (2020). Cluster Sampling Methods. In A. Barbu & S.-C. Zhu (Eds.), Monte Carlo Methods (pp. 123–188). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2971-5_6
  4. Blanch, A., & Blanco, E. (2025). Fluid-Crystallised Abilities and Academic Achievement in Secondary Education and University. Educational Psychology, 45(6), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2025.2497319
  5. Bohle Carbonell, K., Könings, K. D., Segers, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2016). Measuring Adaptive Expertise: Development and Validation of an Instrument. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1036858
  6. Bracher, M. (2022). Literature, Social Wisdom, and Global Justice: Developing Systems Thinking through Literary Study. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003280019
  7. Brandt, W. C. (2023). Measuring Student Success Skills: A Review of the Literature on Self-Directed Learning. In Center For Assessment. http://www.nciea.org
  8. Braund, H., & Timmons, K. (2021). Operationalization of Self-Regulation in the Early Years: Comparing Policy with Theoretical Underpinnings. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-021-00085-7
  9. Chigbu, B. I., Umejesi, I., & Makapela, S. L. (2024). Adaptive Intelligence Revolutionizing Learning and Sustainability in Higher Education: Enhancing Learning and Sustainability with AI. In Implementing Interactive Learning Strategies in Higher Education (pp. 151–176). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3559-8.ch006
  10. Díaz Quezada, V., & Albornoz, M. S. (2023). Validation of an Instrument to Assess Deductive Reasoning in Solving Types of Problems. Nternational Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 13(7), 50. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v13i7.40153
  11. Dostál, J. (2015). Theory of Problem Solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(February), 2798–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.970
  12. Fa, A., Indreswari, H., & Setiyowati, A. J. (2024). How Can We Enhance PISA Ranking Through Effective Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 14(02), 1421–1442. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i2.20241
  13. Fletcher, A., & Benveniste, M. (2022). A New Method for Training Creativity: Narrative as an Alternative to Divergent Thinking. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1512(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14763
  14. Frazier, L. D., Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (2021). The MAPS Model of Self-Regulation: Integrating Metacognition, Agency, and Possible Selves. Metacognition and Learning, 16(2), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09255-3
  15. García-Campayo, J., del Hoyo, Y. L., Barceló-Soler, A., Navarro-Gil, M., Borao, L., Giarin, V., Raziel Tovar-Garcia, R., & Montero-Marin, J. (2018). Exploring the Wisdom Structure: Validation of the Spanish New Short Three-dimensional Wisdom Scale (3D-WS) and Its Explanatory Power on Psychological Health-related Variables. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(May), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00692
  16. Glück, J., & Weststrate, N. M. (2022). The Wisdom Researchers and the Elephant: An Integrative Model of Wise Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(4), 342–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221094650
  17. Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Metacognitive Skills and Problem. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(3), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1594
  18. Hertler, S. C., Figueredo, A. J., & Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M. (2025). Toward a Consolidated Understanding of Intelligence BT. In S. C. Hertler, A. J. Figueredo, & M. Peñaherrera-Aguirre (Eds.), Presidential Age: How and Why Normal Cognitive Aging Impairs Chief Executives (pp. 29–42). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80835-7_4
  19. Hunt, E. (2008). Applying the Theory of Successful Intelligence to Education—The Good, the Bad, and the Ogre: Commentary on Sternberg et al. (2008). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00094.x
  20. Jun, L., Kim, L., & Xe, L. (2024). Implementation of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Methods in Enhancing the Efficiency of Models of Antennas in Complicated Conditions. National Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 6(2), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.31838/NJAP/06.02.03
  21. Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative Behavior as Agentic Action. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 402–415. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/aca0000190
  22. Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., & Roberts, A. M. (2022). Creativity in the Schools: Creativity Models and New Directions. In Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools (3rd Editio, pp. 335–345). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003013778
  23. Khoshneshan, S., Taghvaee, D., & Pirani, Z. (2023). Comparison of the Role of Problem-Solving Skills Training Following Gestalt and Bandura Theories in Problem-Solving Styles of Secondary School Students. Avicenna Journal of Neuro Psycho Physiology, 10(3), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.32592/ajnpp.2023.10.3.101
  24. Lee, S., Han, S., Byun, G., & Son, S. Y. (2022). Social Exchange Relationships and Exchange Ideologies of Employees and Supervisors: A Three‐way Interaction Toward Employee Creativity. Applied Psychology, 71(2), 539–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12338
  25. Li, G., & Xie, L. (2023). The Effects of Job Involvement and Supervisor Developmental Feedback on Employee Creativity: A Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis. Current Psychology, 42(20), 17120–17131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02901-w
  26. Li, J., Xue, E., & Guo, S. (2025). The Effects of PISA on Global Basic Education Reform: A Systematic Literature Review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04403-z
  27. Li, K., Wang, F., Wang, Z., Shi, J., & Xiong, M. (2019). A Polycultural Theory of Wisdom Based on Habermas’s Worldview. Culture & Psychology, 26(2), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X19877915
  28. Ma, H., Zhao, M., Wang, H., Wan, X., Cavanaugh, T. W., & Liu, J. (2021). Promoting Pupils’ Computational Thinking Skills and Self-efficacy: A Problem-solving Instructional Approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1599–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10016-5
  29. Mashinchi, G. M., Hall, S., & Cotter, K. A. (2024). Memory Self-efficacy and Working Memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 31(4), 742–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2023.2259023
  30. Mat Said, N. A., Bujang, S. M., Buang, N. A., Siraj Ramli, H. H., & Awang Besar, M. N. (2022). Critical Thinking Transfer Practice Instrument: A Content Validity Calculation Steps Based on Expert Panel Evaluation. Education in Medicine Journal, 14(3), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2022.14.3.5
  31. Okoye, K. R. E., & Auta, M. A. (2020). Development and Validation of Instrument for Assessing Students Practical Skills in Building Super-Structure Operations in Nigerian Secondary Schools. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 7(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v7i2p1
  32. Pérez, I., San-Juan, J. F., San-Martín, M., & López-Ochoa, L. M. (2013). Application of Computational Intelligence in order to Develop Hybrid Orbit Propagation Methods. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/631628
  33. Qomariyah, S., Darmayanti, R., Rosyidah, U., & Ayuwanti, I. (2023). Indicators and Essay Problem Grids on Three-Dimensional Material: Development of Instruments for Measuring High School Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability. JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 11(1), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14708
  34. S. R. Gopinath, & Dr. A. R. Krishnamurthy. (2018). Problem-Solving Skills Predicts Mental Health Status among Industrial Workers through Life-Skills Education. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 6(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.25215/0602.098
  35. Saw, K. N. N., & Han, B. (2022). Prospective Teachers’ Academic Success in Myanmar: Successful Intelligence and Personality Effects. Journal of Education for Teaching, 48(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1959266
  36. Sternberg, R. J. (2000). The Theory of Successful Intelligence. Gifted Education International, 15(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940001500103
  37. Sternberg, R. J. (2004). What is Wisdom and How Can We Develop It? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260097
  38. Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Adaptive Intelligence: Its Nature and Implications for Education. Education Sciences, 11(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120823
  39. Sternberg, R. J. (2023). What is Wisdom? Sketch of a TOP (Tree of Philosophy) Theory. Review of General Psychology, 28(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680231215433
  40. Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
  41. Voica, C., Singer, F. M., & Stan, E. (2020). How are Motivation and Self-efficacy Interacting in Problem-solving and Problem-posing? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 487–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10005-0
  42. Vorster, N. (2025). Moral Identity and Virtue. In N. Vorster (Ed.), Addressing South Africa’s Moral Crisis: Society, Moral Identity, and the Psycho-Social Dynamics of Post-Apartheid South Africa (pp. 141–161). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97560-8_7
  43. Wang, Z., Hangeldiyeva, M., Ali, A., & Guo, M. (2022). Effect of Enterprise Social Media on Employee Creativity: Social Exchange Theory Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(January), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.812490
  44. Wijaya, T. T., Hidayat, W., Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., & Talib, C. A. (2024). Exploring Contributing Factors to Pisa 2022 Mathematics Achievement: Insights from Indonesian Teachers. Infinity Journal, 13(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p139-156
  45. Yalon-Chamovitz, S., & Greenspan, S. (2005). Ability to Identify, Explain and Solve Problems in Everyday Tasks: Preliminary Validation of a Direct Video Measure of Practical Intelligence. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.08.002
  46. Yuan, R. (2021). Incorporating Life Skills Education in Vocational Training: Toward Empowerment-Based Skills Advancement for Young Women Migrant Workers in China. Journal of Social Service Research, 47(6), 860–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2021.1941502