Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 41 Download : 16

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Inclusive education has become an important agenda in global educational reform, and the introduction of the Merdeka Curriculum in Indonesia represents a significant effort to strengthen equitable access for students with disabilities. However, limited research has examined how inclusive education is managed under this new curriculum in special schools. This study aimed to analyze the management of inclusive education through the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum at SLB Negeri 1 Palopo, focusing on planning, implementation, and evaluation. A qualitative descriptive design was employed, involving the principal, vice principal for curriculum, and teachers as participants, selected purposively for their roles in curriculum management. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis, and analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model with triangulation to ensure trustworthiness. The results revealed that planning was conducted through the development of Individual Learning Plans (RPI), teacher training, and collaboration with external stakeholders. Implementation emphasized differentiated instruction, project-based learning, and the integration of technology to meet diverse student needs, while evaluation employed authentic and flexible methods such as portfolios, performance tasks, and parental involvement. These findings suggest that inclusive education management in special schools requires multi-stakeholder collaboration, teacher autonomy in instructional strategies, and adaptive evaluation systems. The study provides practical recommendations for strengthening teacher competencies, enhancing collaboration with external partners, and developing authentic assessment approaches to ensure the effective realization of inclusive education goals under the Merdeka Curriculum.

Keywords

Curriculum Management Inclusive Education Merdeka Curriculum Special Schools Student-Centered Learning

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Kalsum, U., Muhaemin, M., & Guntur, M. (2025). Managing Inclusive Education through the Merdeka Curriculum: Evidence from an Indonesian Special School. International Journal of Asian Education, 6(3), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v6i3.501
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Al-Qora’n, L. F., Nganji, J. T., & Alsuhimat, F. M. (2025). Designing Inclusive and Adaptive Content in Moodle: A Framework and a Case Study from Jordanian Higher Education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(6), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9060058
  2. Alhalalmeh, A.-H. (2024). The Role of Life Skills in Human Capacity Development. In S. Reyad & A. Hannoon (Eds.), Frontiers of Human Centricity in the Artificial Intelligence-Driven Society 5.0 (pp. 713–725). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73545-5_60
  3. Aulia, M. G., Rokhimawan, M. A., Rifkiya, A., & Arawinda, T. (2025). Transformation of 2013 Curriculum to Merdeka Curriculum in Islamic Religious Education at Vocational Schools. J-PAI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.18860/jpai.v11i2.31516
  4. Ayundari, N. F., & Rustam. (2025). The Transition Process from the 2013 Curriculum (K13) to the Merdeka Curriculum in Learning at MTs Al-Washliyah Tembung. Islamic Management: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(02), 1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.30868/im.v8i02.8580
  5. Bakken, J. P., & Dalmasso, E. A. (2021). Traditional and Innovative Assessment Tehniques for Students with Disabilities: An Introduction. In F. E. Obiakor & J. P. Bakken (Eds.), Traditional and Innovative Assessment Techniques for Students with Disabilities (Vol. 36, pp. 1–16). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-401320210000036001
  6. Darlington-Bernard, A., Salque, C., Masson, J., Darlington, E., Carvalho, G. S., & Carrouel, F. (2023). Defining Life Skills in Health Promotion at School: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Public Health, 11(December), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1296609
  7. DeMatthews, D. E., Serafini, A., & Watson, T. N. (2020). Leading Inclusive Schools: Principal Perceptions, Practices, and Challenges to Meaningful Change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20913897
  8. Douglas, H. (2022). Sampling Techniques for Qualitative Research. In M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady (Eds.), Principles of Social Research Methodology (pp. 415–426). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_29
  9. Elliott, R., & Timulak, L. (2021). Essentials of Descriptive-Interpretive Qualitative Research: A Generic Approach. American Psychological Association. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0000224-000
  10. Fatinah, F. N., Hikmat, M. H., & Ratih, K. (2025). Authentic Assessment in Vocational High School: Teachers’ Perspectives, Practice, and Challenges. Jle: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program, 6(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.47435/jle.v6i1.3881
  11. Gheyssens, E., Coubergs, C., Griful-Freixenet, J., Engels, N., & Struyven, K. (2022). Differentiated Instruction: The Diversity of Teachers’ Philosophy and Praxis to Adapt Teaching to Students’ Interests, Readiness and Learning Profiles. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(14), 1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1812739
  12. Herawan, D. O., & Herlambang, Y. T. (2025). Exploration of Innovative Pedagogical Practices in Implementing an Independent Curriculum as a Manifestation of Independent Learning in The Diversity of Students. Jurnal Paedagogy: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 12(3), 668–679. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i3.16252
  13. Irshad, S., Maan, M. F., Batool, H., & Hanif, A. (2021). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD): An Evaluative Tool for Language Learning and Social Development in Early Childhood Education. Multicultural Education, 7(6), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4940172
  14. Isnawati, D., Zakaria, R. A., & Pratomo, L. C. (2025). Barriers to Inclusion: Exploring the Root Causes of Inclusive Education Challenges in Indonesia. Jurnal UNIK: Pendidikan Luar Biasa, 10(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.30870/unik.v10i1.32033
  15. Karagianni, E., & Drigas, A. (2023). New Technologies for Inclusive Learning for Students with Special Educational Needs. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 19(5), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i05.36417
  16. Kemendikbudristek. (2024). Kajian Akademik Kurikulum Merdeka. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. https://guru.kemendikdasmen.go.id/dokumen/Bod0a3DXpY
  17. Kumayas, T., Luntungan, G. S., Arsai, A. N., & Tatipang, D. P. (2025). Curriculum Reform Meets Classroom Realities: Selected Indonesian Teachers’ Perspectives on the Merdeka Curriculum. REiLA : Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 7(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.31849/5x19dj04
  18. Kurth, J. A., Miller, A. L., & Toews, S. G. (2020). Preparing for and Implementing Effective Inclusive Education With Participation Plans. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 53(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920927433
  19. Lüddeckens, J., Anderson, L., & Östlund, D. (2021). Principals’ Perspectives of Inclusive Education Involving Students with Autism Spectrum Conditions – A Swedish Case Study. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2021-0022
  20. Mahmood, A., Huang, X., & Rehman, N. (2024). The Role of Teachers and Administrators in Supporting the Adaptation of Students with Special Needs in Mainstream High Schools. Quality Education for All, 2(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/QEA-06-2024-0054
  21. Mamvuto, A., & Kangai, P. (2023). Portfolio Implementation for Self-Reflection and Professional Growth of Students in the Arts. Visual Studies, 38(3–4), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2021.1940262
  22. Margolis, A. A. (2020). Zone of Proximal Development, Scaffolding and Teaching Practice. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(3), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160303
  23. Marinho, P., Fernandes, P., & Pimentel, F. (2021). The Digital Portfolio as an Assessment Strategy for Learning in Higher Education. Distance Education, 42(2), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1911628
  24. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd Ed. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Qualitative_Data_Analysis.html?id=3CNrUbTu6CsC&redir_esc=y
  25. Miller, E., & Konstantinou, I. (2021). Using Reflective, Authentic Assessments to Embed Employability Skills in Higher Education. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 14(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-02-2021-0014
  26. Pinar, W. F. (2019). What Is Curriculum Theory? (3rd Editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625683
  27. Pratiwi, A. A. S., Elizar, Apriza, B., & Sumarno. (2024). Evaluating K13 and Merdeka Curriculum Implementation in Primary Education: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 7(3), 491–499. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i3.83226
  28. Priawasana, E., & Subiyantoro, S. (2024). Evaluating the K-13 Versus Merdeka Curriculum: Impacts on Primary, Junior, and Senior High School Education in Indone. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 10(3), 859–867. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i3.12060
  29. Rapp, A. C., & Corral-Granados, A. (2024). Understanding Inclusive Education – A Theoretical Contribution from System Theory and the Constructionist Perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725
  30. Rasid, S. A., Mukhibat, M., & Daryono, R. W. (2024). Evaluation of the Independent Curriculum in Special Schools to Enhance Participation of Children with Special Needs. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 8(2), 817. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v8i2.586
  31. Sari, Z. P., Sarofah, R., & Fadli, Y. (2022). The Implementation of Inclusive Education in Indonesia: Challenges and Achievements. Jurnal Public Policy, 8(4), 264. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v8i4.5420
  32. Somad, A., Haryanto, S., & Darsinah, D. (2024). Inclusive Education for Special Needs Students in Indonesia: A Review of Policies, Practices and Challenges. JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, Dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 9(2), 1024–1035. https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v9i2.16192
  33. Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2023). Assessment for Inclusion: Rethinking Contemporary Strategies in Assessment Design. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057451
  34. Tamsilu, T., Rustan, & Kartini. (2025). Life Skills-Based Leadership Strategy in Improving Madrasah Quality: A Case Study. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 4(4), 1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.7454/ajce.v6i2.1045
  35. Tomlinson, C. A. (2021). Differentiated Instruction in Rural School Contexts. In Gifted Education in Rural Schools: Developing Place-Based Interventions (p. 12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003017004
  36. Tzuriel, D. (2021). The Socio-Cultural Theory of Vygotsky. In D. Tzuriel (Ed.), Mediated Learning and Cognitive Modifiability (pp. 53–66). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75692-5_3
  37. UNCRPD. (2018). United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Disability in American Life: An Encyclopedia of Concepts, Policies, and Controversies, 2(December), 671–675. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845266190-471
  38. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. unesdoc.unesco.org/in/rest/annotationSVC/DownloadWatermarkedAttachment/attach_import_a7ecb044-952d-4cfd-9a14-91db3fa66666?_=098427engo.pdf&to=50&from=1
  39. Wiggins, G. (1990). The Case for Authentic Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 2(2), 1–3. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=2
  40. Yaghoubi, M., Pourhosein Gilakjani, A., & Abbasian, G.-R. (2025). The Effect of Performance-Based Assessment on Academic Resilience, Motivation, and Teacher Support in Virtual Versus Non‑Virtual Classes. Language Testing in Asia, 15(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00385-6